The Women

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐.5
Author: Kristin Hannan
Genres: Historical Fiction
Pub. Date: Feb. 2024

4.5 stars, rounded up. I absolutely flew through this book! I was really excited to read it, but for some reason I was expecting it to be a slow read. I enjoyed The Nightingale, absolutely loved The Great Alone, and didn’t really care for The Four Winds. But Kristin Hannah is back on her game with The Women.

She said in the author’s note that this is a story she’s been wanting to write for a long time, but didn’t want to write it until she was a more mature author. I think now was the right time and that writing about Vietnam captures her at her best. While The Great Alone isn’t really about Vietnam, the fact that Ernt Albright is a POW from Vietnam is really critical to the story. I feel like the Vietnam War is something close to Hannah’s heart, and it shows in her writing.

I think “The Women” is a very uninspired title, but it does fit this book. Hannah explores a lot of themes, but above all, she asks the question, “what about the women?” Frankie McGrath is 21 years old and has just obtained her nursing license in California. Her family has a proud history of military service and her brother, Finlay, is quick to enlist to serve in Vietnam. At that time, America was portrayed as winning the war and the extent of casualties were either limited, or not communicated to the public. 

Frankie misses her brother and is frustrated by the limitations of being a junior nurse. In an effort to get on her Dad’s “hero wall”, which memorializes their family’s service, she decides to enlist as an Army Nurse. Shortly after, the family learns that Finlay’s helicopter has been shot down and he has been killed. But it’s too late for Frankie to back out and she proceeds to basic training and ships out to Saigon.

Once in Vietnam, Frankie quickly has to adapt to the chaotic nature of war. After her initial shock, she becomes a very adept surgical nurse and develops close friendships with the other women. But over time, Frankie becomes disillusioned with the American government and their portrayal of the war and its success. Her mother keeps her updated on the protests at home, but when she returns to America, she is surprised at the level of antipathy the public has towards veterans. As Frankie struggles with PTSD, she realizes that no one even considers nurses to be veterans, and she is refused the few scarce benefits and supports that are offered to the men who served. (it’s not stated, but I’m curious if the male doctors were able to access veteran benefits?)

I love the way this book is written. We spend the first half of the book in Vietnam, where Frankie is exposed to unfathomable terrors, which includes a steady stream of maimed, wounded, and dying soldiers, as well as severely burned Vietnamese civilians who are the accidental (I hope) target of America’s extensive use of Napalm. Frankie rises to the occasion, becoming steady, reliable, and knowledgeable as a combat nurse.

As the reader, you go through this journey with Frankie. Even though I was aware of many of these atrocities, Hannah does an excellent job of conveying the chaos and heartbreak of war through Frankie’s eyes. It’s a brilliant set-up for the rest of her book because she is showing the reader exactly why so many people suffered PTSD from the War. It’s hard to empathize with characters like Ernt Albright in The Great Alone, because I didn’t really know what he went through. But we go through the war with Frankie, so it’s so much easier to understand her struggles.

The entire novel is compelling, but the first half definitely sucks you in. It’s a high stress setting and I could not put the book down. The second half of the book is slightly more understated, but the aftermath of Frankie’s time in Vietnam is the real reason why Hannah is telling this story. To shine a light on the injustices faced after the war by the women who served their country, and in my opinion, this second half is still gripping.

When Frankie returns to America, the culture shock is immense. She is literally spit upon at the airport and her 2 years of service are dismissed by her parents. She has nightmares and trauma responses to stimuli around her. She initially lashes out (justifiably) at both her parents and friends, but she does try to seek help from a veteran’s clinic and is turned away. She’s repeatedly told that “there were no women in Vietnam”, that “she didn’t see combat”, and so as a result “she doesn’t understand what it’s really like”. Her only coping mechanism is to remain silent and try and forget about the war. I’m sure it was still very challenging for the male veterans, who were also experiencing PTSD and public opposition to their service, but I can’t imagine having to also deal with the mass societal gaslighting of being told your experience didn’t even happen.

There’s so much to unpack in this book. At its core, it is a book about women’s history. The late 60’s and early 70’s were a time of change in America, the era of free love. White women were gaining more rights, but women overall still faced a lot of injustice and erasure. The book focuses heavily on Frankie’s PTSD, as well some issues of equal and civil rights. Frankie becomes very close with Ethel and Barb, who were nurses with her in Vietnam, and she relies heavily on these women throughout the novel.

Barb is a black woman, and even though she’s only one character, I’m glad Hannah opted to include her perspective. This is still primarily a white woman’s book, but there is recognition that there were a lot of black men who served their country in Vietnam and that their grassroots organization in the civil rights movement was also largely applied in protesting the war in Vietnam. I don’t think we really get a deep look at how Barb would have been marginalized in the Army and as an activist, or how she might have struggled being friends with two privileged white women, but I was glad to see the inclusion of a strong black woman in the story.

Frankie is a mess in the second half of the book and despite some of her gains, her life continually goes from bad to worse. I could see how her trauma could get repetitive to some readers, but I’m glad that Hannah wrote it this way because PTSD is repetitive. At this time period, PTSD still wasn’t very well understood, especially in women. It is shocking to hear about the high rates of alcohol, drug abuse, and suicide among Vietnam veterans, which is further exacerbated when you learn that many of them also developed cancer or had miscarriages or birth defects as a result of the chemicals the American’s were spraying all over the countryside.

The Vietnam War was really unlike any other war the Americans had participated in at the time. First of all, they lost it, but second of all, because of the opinion of the public, there was no glory in it. The soldiers weren’t coming home to parades like WWI and WWII. I think my problem now is that I don’t really know who is to blame, although this may be a byproduct of a lack of knowledge on my part. America was committing atrocities in Vietnam. The book doesn’t outright address incidents like the My Lai massacre, but it is demonstrated through the number of Vietnamese civilians that Frankie treats in her OR and what she witnesses at the mobile clinics. The question this book doesn’t answer is, who is accountable? 

How aware was the average soldier about the injustices the US committed against Vietnamese citizens? Can you separate the war from the soldiers? Frankie asks the question, can’t the American public support the troops and protest the government? These men and women are still serving their country, the same as in WWI and WWII, but what if your government or your superiors are acting in bad faith? I honestly don’t know the answer. Many people who are tried for war crimes throughout history use the excuse that they were just following orders, at what point are you serving your country and at what point do you become the villain? 

As a set-up to examine the impacts of war and the struggles of a country divided, I think this book is brilliant. I think Hannah asks all the right questions and focuses on the right themes. Her execution is excellent. What you’ll notice I haven’t mentioned yet is any of the personal drama in the novel, of which there is no shortage. Frankie has varying relationships with 3 men throughout the book and while this narrative is compelling, it’s secondary. I liked Frankie’s interactions with Jamie and Rye and Henry. I think they all add something different to the story and are good tools for engaging the reader. Jamie and Rye are used to explore Frankie’s personal moral code and demonstrate the heartbreak of war, while Henry is a good man and friend who helps Frankie along her healing journey. What I didn’t think was needed was the soap opera plot.

This is probably my one criticism of the book. This is my 4th Kristin Hannah book, so I knew the final act soapbox was coming, but it disappoints me every time. Hannah always adds a surprising (or not so surprising) twist to her books and it irks me because I think it’s both unnecessary and manipulative. Some readers love it because it really reinforces the heartbreak and tragedy of the story, but while still compelling, I think that Frankie’s romantic relationships are the least interesting thing about her.

Yes, Frankie did need to hit rock bottom to finally seek the help she needed. Overall, I did like how her healing journey was handled, but I feel that certain elements of the story are included only to shock and manipulate the reader emotionally. You don’t need the intense personal drama Kristin! I adore Frankie of her own merits. I had the same criticism about The Great Alone and felt the dramatic ending marred an otherwise perfect story.

But I can get over it. These dramatic elements are a way to further engage your reader. It does make for compelling storytelling and I know a lot of readers love it. I just don’t want Frankie’s personal relationships to detract from the much more important themes of this book. I’d still highly highly recommend this book. It evoked so much critical thought for me and I’m holding it to such a high standard. I questioned whether I’d outgrown Kristin Hannah after I didn’t care for The Four Winds, but I will absolutely continue to read her books. A fantastic read!

The Women is my book club’s pick for May, so my rating may change after I meet with them next week, but for now, it’s 4.5 stars, rounded up.

The Story of a New Name

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐
Author: Elena Ferrante
Genres: Historical Fiction
Pub. Date: Sep. 2012
Format: Audiobook

This series infuriates me.

I hate all the characters and the plot is outrageous. But I can’t deny that this is *literature*. I want to scream at all the characters, but they are 100% a product of their circumstances. Our protagonist is the most frustrating because she is one of the few people to become educated and get the opportunity to leave the neighbourhood, but is ignorant to understanding what drives the people around her. Elena will only ever see herself as poor and because of her formative childhood experiences with Lila, does not recognize how how much better off she is than her friends. She is the only person with the real ability to leave the neighbourhood of her own volition, but fails to recognize her self-worth.

This theme is further reinforced through Nino’s character, who despite also being educated, is an idiot. In contrast to Elena, Nino is well aware of his self-worth, but is incredibly selfish and heavily influenced by his own ego. He takes no ownership over any of his actions and is happy to discard his relationships when they no longer benefit him.

What is the most difficult for me to grasp is Elena and Lila’s friendship. There is obviously a strong connection between these two women, but I’m not 100% sure what makes them friends. It’s clear they are drawn to one another, but it’s a relationship heavily influenced by competition. I want to believe that these are two dear friends, for whom jealousy eats away at their bond over time. But I’ve never seen any strong roots between these two characters. There was a brief period of simplicity between them as children, when they had the common ground of both being victims of their upbringing, but that bond didn’t seem strong enough to me to withstand all the trials they’ve put their friendship through.

For me, Lila is an inflammatory character. I know this is intentional, but the jealousy and competition between these two characters is so prevalent that it’s hard to believe the two could still tolerate to be around one another. After Ischia, there is an extended period of distance between them. For me it begs the question of when the meaningful and moving part of their friendship will be showcased?

But damn, this series is well written. I love a good unlikeable character and you cannot deny that Ferrante is a genius at distilling relationships. This does read like classic literature to me in that, it’s at times boring, it can feel extraneous and overwritten, and yet, even the most mundane of interactions serves to provide depth and nuance to a complicated cast of characters. The characterization is central to the themes of the novel, and yet the plot is still engaging and critical to the story. It’s a blend of these two essential elements of literature. It makes me want to beat my head against the wall at the ignorance and stupidity of the characters, but they are so well crafted that you can’t help to step back and reflect on what makes these people react the way them do.

I kind of hate it, but I can’t stop thinking about it. I definitely need a break from this series, but of course that ending has me wondering what more chaos and heartache Nino is going to bring to the story in the next volume. Most of all, I hope to see some real threads of friendship and selflessness between Elena and Lila. And I hope that Elena will finally start to recognize her own self-worth.

My Brilliant Friend

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Author: Heather Fawcett
Genres: Middle Grade, Fiction
Pub. Date: Jun. 2023

I finally finished it!

I’ve been working on this book for literal months. I’m shocked because it’s so beloved, but I found it incredibly slow moving and frankly boring. I was only able to finish it because I switched to a library audiobook for the last 100 pages. It did get a lot more compelling towards the end, but I’m not sure if it’s that the plot got more interesting or that it worked better as an audiobook. I listened to the sample months ago and thought I didn’t like the narrator at all, but actually, she did a pretty good job.

I do get why people like this book. I found it to be incredibly tedious, but I can still acknowledge that Ferrante is a perceptive author. I’m not ready to say she’s talented because of how slow the writing is, but her examination of relationships and conflict is very well done. I felt that she examined every facet of Lila and Elena’s friendship and every emotion that makes us human. Their relationship is very complicated, with both girls oscillating between admiration and jealousy. Elena’s infatuation with Lila results in an imbalance in their friendship and heavily influences the way she views herself. She wants to be like Lila, and her constant comparison between them only leads to her own unhappiness. Likewise, I believe that Lila knows she will never truly measure up to her brilliant friend and seeks to control Elena in other ways to maintain her own sense of self-worth.

At least, that was my interpretation of their friendship. But it’s so nuanced that I was never sure if these girls secretly loved or hated one another. I think there is a genuine friendship there, but it’s buried under many layers of conflicting feelings.

Ferrante goes incredibly in depth to the lives of Lila and Elena. While I found it quite boring for most of the book, I think it does contribute to the success of the story. Ferrante lives and breathes this world. It is incredibly well realized and nuanced, and I felt that I was living Elena’s life rather than just reading about it. This depth brings the characters to life, and I’ve always felt that a well realized set of minor characters is what makes a world so compelling.

I debated quitting this book around the 200-page mark and several people encouraged me to keep going. I wanted to finish, but I was pretty convinced I wouldn’t continue the series. I do admit to feeling the pull to continue now that I’ve finished. It reminds me of State of Wonder by Ann Patchett. The content couldn’t be more different, but it also took me months to finish State of Wonder, and when I did finish it, I couldn’t stop thinking about it. Even though I didn’t enjoy most of the reading experience, it made for a memorable book. I have a sneaking suspicion that may be the case with this book, so I’ll give it a few days and see if I want to keep going. I’ll definitely be continuing with audiobook if I do – I am a little intrigued.

Side note: what kind of author names their main character their actual name? This mystified me.

Lady Tan’s Circle of Women

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐
Author: Lisa See
Genres: Historical Fiction
Pub. Date: Jun. 2023

This is my 4th Lisa See book and I really love her as an author. I thought this had a slow start, but picked up a lot in the second half. It had the usual hallmarks of Lisa’s work in that it was really well written and filled with historical details and meaningful female relationships.

So I did like it, but it wasn’t quite as compelling as some of her other work. I felt she should have developed the front end of the book a little bit more because it was both boring, and didn’t have enough meat about Yunxian and Meiling’s relationship. It reminded me a lot of Snow Flower, even though it’s set several hundred years earlier. I found the character arcs and plot points similar, but Lady Tan isn’t set during any particular significant historical events, which is what I thought anchored both Snow Flower and the Island Of Sea Women.

The concept of female doctors for women is really intriguing and (I thought) quite revolutionary for the time period, so I liked that aspect. But a lot of the intrigue is fabricated, which is fine, just a bit less compelling. It took too long for the story to get going with not much happening. I felt like I was reading a history novel for the first half, before we finally got some drama in the second half.

Anyways, it wasn’t my favourite, but I still love Lisa See. I think The Island of Sea Women may be my favourite book she’s written, so if you’re new to her writing, I’d maybe suggest starting with that one! But I also enjoyed both The Tea Girl of Hummingbird Lane and Snow Flower and the Secret Fan better than this one, so check out my reviews for those too.

The Color Purple

Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
Author: Alice Walker
Genres: Historical Fiction, Classics
Pub. Date: June 1982

I had an old copy of this on my bookshelf in Newfoundland for years. I can remember starting it, but I don’t think I ever finished it, so I was really happy to return to it with my book club in time for the movie adaptation coming out later this year. 

The Colour Purple is an American classic, and with good reason. It’s set in the South from the early 1900’s, to around WWII (roughly 1910-1940). It’s about civil rights, but from a different perspective than we normally see. It’s told in a series of letters written by Celie, an uneducated, poor black girl who lives with her Ma and Pa. After being raped several times by her Pa, starting at 14, her children are taken from her. She’s separated from her sister Nettie, her only friend, and is eventually married off to another abusive man, Albert. 

Over the years, Celie writes to God about the injustices she faces, and eventually to Nettie when they are reconciled as adults. It’s an examination of how racism and abuse were still heavily present in the south during this time and how a group of women come to find support in one another to become better versions of themselves.

Most notable is the writing style. Alice Walker writes Celie’s letters from the point of view of a young women with limited schooling, who is confused and overcome by the world around her. It’s extremely hard to read at first, both because of the poor grammar and spelling used in the writing, but also because Celie’s experiences are so unbelievably painful and her confusion around them causes her to become very detached from what happens to her. Celie has such limited ownership over her life that I actually thought the setting was about 100 years earlier, during slavery. However, it becomes apparent pretty fast that slavery was ended in name only and is very much still alive in Celie’s life.

Overall I thought this book was quite radical for when it was published and for the content it addresses. We are introduced to a number of black women and they all bring something very unique to the story. While Celie is very much a victim – we also have headstrong Sofia, confident Shug, compassionate Nettie, and tolerant Mary Agnes. These women move in and out of one another’s lives, but all become a source of support and growth for Celie. Most impactful for me was probably Sophia and Nettie.

I thought Sophia’s story was really interesting because it showcased “modern” slavery and how all it took was for Sophia to stand up for herself once to then wind up in prison for a decade before being forced into indentured servitude. On the other end of the spectrum, I liked Nettie’s story because it showcased the complicated dynamics of being black in America versus being black in Africa and how the two perceive each other. Plus, it examines how sexism is the same on either continent.

So overall, I really liked this. It takes a little bit of time to used to the writing style and I found the timeline really confusing, but it gave me a lot to think about and I can understand why it has become a classic. I’m glad the movie doesn’t come out until the end of the year though because it’s a very emotional read and I don’t think I’ll be ready to revisit the story for another few months.