Rating: ⭐.5 Author: Ali Hazelwood Genres: Romance Pub. Date: May 2022
Wow, this was terrible. I strongly suspected it was going to be bad, which is why I didn’t pick it up until now. I’ve been reading Loathe to Love You as my late-night-I-can’t-fall-asleep book and I’m sorry, but this was really trash. Not just smutty trash, but like… garbage.
Apparently there is a point of diminishing returns on Ali Hazelwood’s writing. I still loved TLH for the STEM setting and because it was something new, but Hazelwood just keeps writing the same story over and over again. Apparently this is just her early works fan fiction, re-written and published, and it shows folks! There is absolutely nothing happening in this 112 page story. Mara’s stream of consciousness narration is the stupid kind of girly-quirky that I hate, Liam has the personality of a boiled potato, and together they have zero chemistry. This woman is an engineer? Let’s see some of her engineering world rather than just telling us about sexist male engineers. SHOW ME.
I don’t think Mara leaves the house throughout the entire novella, and since there’s really no slow burn tension, I was hoping Hazelwood would just commit to the smut at the very least (I feel like that’s why this was written?). But then I read the smut scene and OMG you guys! It’s so bad and honestly, kind of non-consensual. It was cringe-inducing, I wish I could erase it from my memory. Also, is Liam ace? is he demi? You can’t just have him say “I don’t like sex” in the middle of sex and then not explore that at all. Like, at the very least, Mara needs to check in with him emotionally. They could both use a reminder about what consent looks like.
Honestly, this was a 1-star red for me, but I save that for truly offensive books, so it can have 1.5 stars. I don’t think I will be reading the other two novellas, but who knows. Ali Hazelwood has some kind of women-in-stem power over me and I keep thinking it will be better.
The Circle is the 3rd book in Katherena Vermette’s loosely related trilogy. I say “loose” because any of her books can be read as a standalone and while they feature many of the same characters, it’s not necessary to have read any of the others (I actually didn’t realize the first 2 were related until The Circle came out). I really loved her first two books, The Break and The Strangers, so I was super enthused about getting another book about these families.
All 3 books have fantastic writing and The Circle was no exception. Vermette is great at capturing both characters and atmosphere. It’s hard for me to remember the first two books now since it was so long ago that I read them – they all focus on generational trauma in metis families. The Break focuses on a violent crime against one family, while The Strangers looks at the family of the girl who committed the crime. The Circle is a marriage of the two books and examines the long term impact and inter-connectness of each of these characters.
I thought the concept of The Circle was fantastic. Let’s look at the cascading impacts of one event on so many people and examine how everyone’s process of healing is different. The Circle centers around this idea that to heal, you bring everyone together and give space for everyone’s pain. Whether or not this idea is valid, I have no idea. I can see how in some ways it could be healing, but I could also see how in other cases it might do more damage than good. Some of these characters are healing, while others are just perpetuating the cycle of violence and trauma.
In any case, this tangible idea of The Circle isn’t really explored in this book, it’s more of an abstract circle. Like I said, I liked the idea and I still think Vermette’s writing and characterization is very strong, but I struggled with the format. She writes every chapter from the perspective of a different character. It’s honestly impressive that each character gets such limited page time and yet she’s still able to get her reader to empathize with most of them. But I felt the scope was just too large for this short book and some perspectives definitely added a lot more to the story than others. There were some storylines that I really wanted to revisit, and others that I didn’t think added much. I would rather see an in-depth look at the main characters from the first two books rather than have the story spread across 20+ narrators.
It’s still a sad and moving story and I did still like it. I just wanted a lot more about Phoenix, Cedar, and Jake. I know that’s not really the point Vermette was trying to make, but it made the book harder to pick up again once you put it down. It didn’t have quite the same draw as her other books because the narrative was split too thin.
That said, I will still be continuing to pick up any of Vermette’s future books because she is a very talented writer!
I honestly don’t know whether I loved this or hated it…
Okay, I definitely didn’t hate it – I thought it was a super quick read and the characters had a lot of chemistry. They’re both a mess and I wanted them to sort out their personal issues, but I understood why they were incapable of doing so. This was truly enemies-to-friends-to-lovers and I loved that about it.
Mostly I just hated Josh. He endeared himself to me after awhile, but my god, this is the most entitled, dumbass, privileged, white man I’ve ever read about! It was a little unbelievable how tone deaf he was considering how progressive Ari was. Both characters are also super depressed and I don’t think the book dealt with their depression in a healthy way. Neither ever seeks professional help, which I thought they both should.
The author is apparently all about portraying “real” relationships that are reflective of the messy and complicated world we live it. But it’s 2023 and I would have loved if she had applied a more critical lens to her characters’ mental health and how they’re going to take care of themselves in the long term. It reminded me a lot of Adelaide, by Genevieve Wheeler, which I read earlier this year, except not as gritty or reflective. This is still a proper romance (which Adelaide definitely isn’t).
Anyways, apparently it’s based on When Harry Met Sally, which I haven’t actually seen, but am definitely going to go and watch now. The reviews mostly say that it’s not actually like the movie, but even from the synopsis, I could see the parallels, so I will have to go watch it and report back!
Is this worth reading? Honestly… maybe? I did read it in a bit of stupor-like fever dream over 3 days and I couldn’t put it down. The dialogue is quite good and like I said, the chemistry is great. It’s not your run-of-the-mill romance novel and I appreciated that the author tried to do something different. I’m just not 100% sure what her themes were and I don’t really think they landed. This is not a fantasy romance that one might dream about, and with a lack of meaningful themes, it leaves me kind of wondering what is the point? At the end of the day, all I can really conclude from this is that there really are no consequences for idiot white men. They can walk all over women of colour, never issue any meaningful apology for their dumb shit, sit at home in their giant apartments doing nothing for an entire year, and then still inherit a well-known restaurant, fail upwards, and get the girl. So inspirational.
So…. I can’t lie, I hated this. I’m literally offended this book made it to the Canada Reads shortlist. Read the other selections over this one.
I don’t give books 1 star unless they’re actually offensive, but this was so disappointing. I read Carley Fortune’s first book, Every Summer After, earlier this year, and despite one key plot point that I hated, I really liked the book. It’s one of the best Friends to Lovers stories I’ve ever read and it would have been a slam dunk but for the big ugly cheating incident.
Meet Me at the Lake sounded a lot like Every Summer After from the beginning: they’re both second chance romance, they’re both set in Ontario lake country, and they both open with a parent death and center on grief. Second chance romance isn’t my favourite trope, but I do like it when it’s believable and done right, like in Every Summer After. So I was happy to pick this up and read another book set in Canada.
In Meet Me at the Lake, our protagonists, Fern and Will, meet for a day in Toronto in their early twenties. Their time together is brief, but they leave a lasting impact on one another’s lives. Fast forward 10 years and Will shows up at Fern’s family resort after the death of her mother and the two have the opportunity to reconnect and heal past hurts.
It was like this book took everything I liked about Every Summer After and threw it away, only focusing on all the parts I disliked. 10 years is simply too long for this kind of second chance romance. I believe it in Every Summer After because Carley Fortune sold me on such a beautiful childhood friendship and bond, but Fern and Will are brief moments in one another’s lives. They don’t really know anything meaningful about one another and it’s insulting to paint them as star crossed lovers who really understand each other after spending less than 24 hours together.
I thought Will was absolutely insufferable, acting like he knew what Fern wants when he only spent a day with her 10 years ago. Why try and sell us on Fern’s desire to build something for herself, only to push her in the complete opposite direction later? I don’t care if he was supporting his sister, he was such a flake to Fern. It wasn’t obvious to me why he showed up at the resort or why he stayed. He flip flopped around so much – one minute he has no interest in Fern, then he desperately wants her, only to turn around again and reject her. He treated her like garbage and then the author has the audacity to make Fern chase after him and try to win him back in the final scenes? NO THANK YOU!
My biggest problem with this book was that it’s incredibly boring. The single day Will and Fern spend together is extremely stretched out considering how little of note actually happens; and the present day storyline focused way too much on the minutiae of the resort to be at all compelling. It took me so long to read the book because I felt like nothing was happening and I was so bored. Will is boring, Fern is boring, I honestly have no idea what these two characters see in each other or why they fell in love. Neither of them is particularly memorable. Maybe that’s why they fall in love – because they both have the personality of a boiled potato – I didn’t believe any part of their love story. There’s a side plot with Fern’s mom and her dad and her mom’s lover, but it added very little to the story and it wasn’t compelling either.
To round off this review, I obviously have to come at Carley Fortune for the cheating trope because she clearly has no idea where the line is! Maybe I’m old fashioned, but the amount of emotional cheating in both of her books is unbelievable. She limits the physical cheating to one key scene, but why are her protagonists always attached to other people when they fall in love? Why do they seem to think it’s fine to emotionally cheat on their partners? I’m mystified. Honestly, I loved Every Summer After so much I think I’d be willing to give Fortune another try? But I seriously hated this so much, I’m not sure if it’s worth it. I do not recommend this. Go read Every Summer After instead.
Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Author: Ali Hazelwood Genres: Romance, Fiction Pub. Date: June 2023
If you’ve been following me on this Ali Hazelwood journey, I loved The Love Hypothesis and hated Love on the Brain. I felt they were essentially the same book. As a result, I was nervous going into this book – it definitely has some flaws, but I ended up actually quite liking it.
Love Theoretically focuses on two physicists from competing areas of physics. Elsie is a theoretical physicist, while Jack is an experimental physicist. The two rivals butt heads, but prolonged time together brings out an appreciation and admiration for each other’s work. You know the drill – rivals to lovers – nothing too revolutionary for Ali Hazelwood or the romance genre.
While Hazelwood relies on a lot of the same tropes as her previous books, I do think that Love Theoretically was a fresh take on her STEMinist themes and I thought both the plot and the characters offered up a lot more nuance than they did in Love on the Brain. My biggest complaints for Love of the Brain was that Bee and Levi were extremely boring people and that the plot was lacking. In contrast, Elsie and Jack had a lot more character development and growth – I didn’t feel like they were carbon copies of Hazelwood’s other characters. Elsie and Jack both stood solidly on their own, they were flawed but likeable, and I understood what each saw in the other and why they fell in love. While Jack is still incessantly described as “big”, I didn’t feel like he was an Adam Driver stand-in like I did in the other two books.
Likewise, the plot was better thought out in this book. I liked the ongoing theme of Elsie learning to do things for herself and the plotline with the physics rivalry and her academic advisor. It was a bit slow at first with the extended interview, and I think it got a little lost at 70% with so many sex scenes (where’s the plot?), but overall, a much better plot progression and it kept me engaged throughout the novel. I do really like her academic and STEM settings; I felt that in Love on the Brain, she had a lot of ideas, but didn’t know how to execute them, whereas in this book she had clear themes and progressed them in greater depth.
I’m a little bit torn on Hazelwood’s style of writing. Her writing style is very colloquial and I think she invests a lot of time in making it hip and quirky. I don’t really like it, but I can’t deny it makes for easy reading. I absolutely devoured the book, reading the entire thing in 2 sittings in less than 24 hours. So it’s hard to critique the writing because it’s obviously compelling, I just don’t find it very realistic. I feel like Olive had no personality and Hazelwood remedied this by making Bee and Elsie super quirky. I can accept this style of writing, but I had trouble buying into the way the characters talk to each other because I thought the dialogue was just really unrealistic, particularly between Elsie and Cece. It’s definitely a stream-of-consciousness style of writing and sometimes it was hard to differentiate between internal monologue and dialogue. I feel like the author inserts her opinions into the writing a lot as kind of sidebar comments, but they just read weird to me.
Overall though, it was a cute story. Elsie and Jack didn’t feel like the same characters as Olive/Bee and Adam/Levi, but I can’t deny Hazelwood is not the most creative writer. This did feel like a bit of a mix of both of her previous books. I’ve already mentioned that I’m exhausted with the “big” men trope, but I’m also a bit tired of all of the male leads being in positions of power over the female leads. The men are all older and I know that it’s traditionally men who will hold the positions of power, but it’s just giving me a bit of the ick-factor after 3 books, plus I felt it this book was lacking in any kind of diversity.
But my real gripe is with the miscommunication trope. This is clearly Hazelwood’s favourite and it is just so grating! It was definitely worse in Love on the Brain, but it’s still pretty bad in this one too. I’d love to see the female lead not being an idiot in at least one book. I just don’t like Hazelwood’s choice to have her male leads drive most of the social change in her books. I think she does it for romance reasons, but let’s be real, it’s always the marginalized group that will ultimately make change happen. I didn’t like that Adam ultimately got Tom fired in Love Hypothesis and that Jack got the two sexist professors removed from the panel and was the biggest advocate for physicists collaborating. I did love George as a character though!
Anyways, viewed in isolation, I think Love Theoretically may actually be the strongest of the 3 books. I liked Love Hypothesis a lot, but the fake dating aspect was pretty juvenile and unbelievable. Everyone should skip Love on the Brain altogether, but this one was a pretty good balance of character and plot development. The characters are likable, the romance is cute, but collectively, none of Hazelwood’s books are really that different from one another. But I can’t lie, I’ll probably still buy the next one (well her next adult romance anyways, I’m not interested in her YA book and her novellas were terrible). At least someone is writing about women in STEM!
The Paperback Princess 